Epistemologi : Imre Lakatos (Program Riset) dan Penerapan Metodologinya dalam Pendidikan Islam
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper discusses the importance of developing research programs in Islamic studies to produce fundamental theories and principles that can serve as a “protective belt” for Islamic science. The author criticizes the normative and less innovative research approach, and highlights the change of education system in Indonesia from KTSP to K13 which requires a dynamic and flexible curriculum. By proposing the application of Imre Lakatos' research methodology, this paper aims to dynamize science and integrate existing theories. Lakatos' methodology, which consists of a central core, a protective circle, and a series of theories, offers a more open and critical approach to religious thought, encouraging research based on rational argumentation. This research uses a qualitative approach and content analysis to explore Lakatos' ideas and their relevance in the context of religious moderation and Islamic education. In conclusion, it is important to continue building research programs in Islamic studies in order to produce knowledge that is relevant and useful for the ummah.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Content License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi Pendekatan Integratif-interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Aziz, A. A. (2014). Pemikiran Imre Lakatos (1922-1974) tentang Metodologi Program Riset dan Signifikansinya dalam Kajian Keislaman. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2006.1.1.42-55
Corfield, D. (1997). Assaying lakatos’s philosophy of mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 28(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00002-7
ERNEST, P. (1997). The Legacy of Lakatos: Reconceptualising the Philosophy of Mathematics††. Philosophia Mathematica, 5(2), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/5.2.116
Freguglia, P. (1992). Historiography and epistemology in Lakatos (Italian). Epistemology of mathematics: 1989-1991 Seminars.
Grunfled, J. (1982). Lakatos’s weak rationalism. Science et Esprit, XXXIV(2).
Kadvany, J. (2001). Imre Lakatos and the Guise of Reason. Duke University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsification and the Methodology of Research Programmes”, dalam I. Lakatos dan A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Larvor, B. (1998). Lakatos an Intoduction. Rouletde.
Muslih, M. (2005). Filsafat Ilmu Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar Peradigma dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan. Belukar.
Popper. (1983). Conjectures and Refutations. dikutip A.F. Chalmers, Apa itu yang Dinamakan Ilmu? (Terjemahan). Hasta Mitra.
Wettersten, J. (1992). Searching for the Holy in the Ascent of Imre Lakatos”. P. Freguglia. “Historiography and epistemology in Lakatos.” In Epistemology of Mathematics: 1989-1991 Seminars.
Zucker, A. (1996). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Prentice-Hall Inc.