Sanksi Advokat dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Advokat Terhadap Klien: Kasus Frederich Yunadi
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the violation of the code of ethics commited by an advocate. The formulation of the problem raised in this study regarding violations of the code of ethics is included in the case 0f Frederich Yunadi. The code of ethics that was violated included violations of the obligations carried out by advocates when carrying out their duties, both outside and inside the court. This code of ethics exists because it aims to ensure that advocates can carry out their profession properly, then be responsible, and can maintain and improve the professionalism of their profession. Research related to this issue uses a normative legal method, with data sources including primary and secondary data, such as books, documents, journals and other literature. The data collection technique used was a literature study, namely reviewing various written information regarding professional ethics and law from relevant sources and widely published, according to the needs of normative legal research. Violations of the advocate’s code of ethics, such as in the case of Frederich Yunadi, show that advocates have an obligation to protect the rights and interests of clients. The case of Frederich Yunadi sjows a serious violation of the advocate’s code of ethics in Indonesia. This reflects a lack of integrity and professionalism in legal practice.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Content License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Farnesty, E. (2024). Etika Profesi Hukum: Mengungkap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Dalam Kasus Suap Pengacara. Jurnal Hukum Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 105.
Lubis, F. (2024). Bunga Rampai Hukum Keadvokatan. Medan: FEBI UINSU Press.
Nggabut, G. D. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Advokat. Perkara:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 307.
Oktavianti, R. (2019). Obstruction of Justice Oleh Advokat Terhadap Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 9/Pid-Sus-Tpk/2018/PnJkt.Pst). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 56.
Priyana, D. M. (2022). Penerapan Sanksi Kode Etik Terhadap Advokat Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Profesi di Indonesia. Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani, 79.
SINAGA, N. (2020). Kode etik sebagai profesi hukum yang baik. jurnal ilmiah hukum dirgantara, 12.
Tarantang, J. (2018). Advokat Mulia (Paradigma Hukum Profetik Dalam Sengketa Hukum Keluarga Islam. Yogyakarta: K-Media.
Ulum, K. M., Ariyanti, S., Suganda, R., Rahmawati, D., & Khotimah, H. (2024). Sengketa Dalam Kontrak Pendanaan Digital: Analisis Hukum Keperdataan Dan Alternatif Penyelesaiannya. Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Keperdataan, 10(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v10i2.11601
Ulum, K. M., & Ulum, M. K. (2023). Screening Standards in Sharia Capital Market Investor Legal Protection. El-Mashlahah, 13(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i1.5791