From Tafaqquh to Indhār: Reconstructing Social Responsibility in Islamic Education through Qs. Al-Taubah [9]: 122

Main Article Content

Imronudin Imronudin
Riza Muhammad
Rifqi Muhammad Solah

Abstract

Tafaqquh fī al-dīn in Q.S. al-Tawbah [9]:122 is often understood as the obligation to deepen religious knowledge; however, such a reading does not adequately explain where knowledge is directed once intellectual depth has been attained. This issue is significant because an educational system that measures achievement primarily through the accumulation of knowledge risks producing forms of specialization that are epistemically strong but socially detached. This study therefore reconstructs tafaqquh as an epistemic construct that connects depth of knowledge with collective life. Employing library research, tafsīr al-mawḍūʿī, and Paul Ricœur’s hermeneutics, Q.S. al-Tawbah [9]:122 is read intertextually alongside Q.S. al-Zumar [39]:9, al-Mujādilah [58]:11, Fāṭir [35]:28, Āli ʿImrān [3]:104, al-Naḥl [16]:125, and al-ʿAṣr [103]:1–3, and subsequently brought into dialogue with the thought of Edward Said, Jürgen Habermas, and Jacques Rancière. The findings demonstrate that tafaqquh is not merely knowledge acquisition but constitutes epistemic depth: the capacity to understand and assess complex matters profoundly while remaining socially oriented from the outset. This orientation is marked by rujūʿ to the qawm and enacted through inżār, whereby expertise does not culminate in individual authority but is returned to the community as a shared epistemic resource. Meanwhile, yaḥżarūn indicates the social objective of this process, namely the cultivation of collective awareness and collective epistemic capacity. These findings lead to the reconstruction of the Qur’anic public intellectual as a figure who differs not only from the specialist and professional expert, but also reconfigures the modern notion of the public intellectual: publicness is not primarily defined by participation in public debate, but by the inherent responsibility of knowledge to return to, warn, and strengthen the community’s capacity to interpret reality. Accordingly, this study proposes a paradigm shift from knowledge acquisition to knowledge as social responsibility, providing a conceptual basis for rethinking Islamic education and Muslim intellectual ethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

From Tafaqquh to Indhār: Reconstructing Social Responsibility in Islamic Education through Qs. Al-Taubah [9]: 122. (2026). Mauriduna : Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(3), 562-581. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v7i3.172

References

Abdurahman Wahid. (2007). Islam Kosmopolitan. Wahid Institute.

Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad al-Anṣārī al-Qurṭubī. (1964). Al-Jāmiʽ li Aḥkām al-Qur’an (1st ed., Vol. 8). Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Ahyar, D. B. (2019). Analisis Teks Dalam Penelitian Kebahasaan (Sebuah Teori Dan Aplikatif). Shaut al Arabiyyah, 7(2), 100–120.

Al-Attas, M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam (1st ed.). Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. https://www.academia.edu/download/53532036/attas-concept_of_edu_in_islam_text-final.pdf

Arifin, A. P. O., Ghozali, A. M., Budimansyah, B., Muttaqien, D. H., & Handayani, S. F. (2026). The Socio-Political Dimension of Da’wah in the Qur’an: Thematic Analysis of the Relationship Between Da’wah and Power. Studia Quranika, 10(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.21111/studiaquranika.v10i2.128.

Baiḍāwī, Abū Saʽīd Abdullah b ʽUmar b Muḥammad. (1416H). Anwār al-Tanzīl wa Asrār al-Ta’wīl (1st ed., Vol. 3). Dār al-Iḥyā’ Turāṡ al-’Arabi.

Bashier Badi, J. A. (2025). Fundamental Thinking Terms in the Qur’an: A Connotative Analytical Framework for Islamic Epistemology. Al-Shajarah Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 30(02), 313–354. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v30i02.2169

Biesta, G. (2017). Don’t be Fooled by Ignorant Schoolmasters: On the Role of the Teacher in Emancipatory Education. Policy Futures in Education, 15(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316681202

Candrika, A. R. A., & Nisa, N. (2025). Penyebaran Islam Nusantara dan Analisis Asbabun Nuzul Surah Al-Taubah Ayat 122. JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan), 8.

Dallyn, S., Marinetto, M., & Cederström, C. (2015). The Academic as Public Intellectual: Examining Public Engagement in the Professionalised Academy. Sociology, 49(6), 1031–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515586681

Dann, R. (2016). Developing Understanding of Pupil Feedback Using Habermas’ Notion of Communicative Action. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1056083

Fajri, R. N., Nur, W. A. P., & Khair, B. (2026). Konsep Murid Sejati Dalam Perspektif Qs. At-Taubah/9: 122: Analisis Tafsir Tentang Objek Pendidikan Dalam Islam. 2(1).

Farmāwī, A. al-Ḥayy. (1977). Al-Bidāyah fī al-Tafsīr al-Mawḍūʿī: Dirāsah Manhajiyyah Mawḍūʿiyyah (2nd ed.). Cairo: Maktabat Jumhūriyyah Miṣr.

Friedland, L. A., & Kunelius, R. (2023). The Public Sphere and Contemporary Lifeworld: Reconstruction in the Context of Systemic Crises. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad010

Furia, P. (2022). Understanding and Explanation. Paul Ricœur and Human Geography. Continental Philosophy Review, 55(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09554-9

Godonoga, A., & Sporn, B. (2023). The conceptualisation of Socially Responsible Universities in Higher Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review. Studies in Higher Education, 48(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2145462

Grant Farred. (1995). Representations of the Intellectual by Edward Said. Wayne State University Press, 37(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23116618

Haryatmoko. (2016). Membongkar Rezim Kepastian: Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis (1st ed.). Kanisius.

Indrawan, C. J., & Abidin, Z. (2022). Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam Dalam Al-Qur’an Surat At-Taubah Ayat 122 [PhD Thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/103269

Indriyastutik, S. (2019). Disensus – Demokrasi Sebagai Perselisihan Menurut Jacques Rancière (1st ed.). Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Irma Suryani. (2024). The Concept of Islamic Education in the Perspective of the Qur’an Surah at Tawbah Verse 122. EDUQUR’ANIA: International Journal of Islamic Education Based on The Quran, 1(1)

Jaṣṣāṣ, Abū Bakar al-Rāzī. (1405). Aḥkām al-Qur’an (1st ed., Vol. 4). Dār al-Iḥyā’ Turāṡ al-’Arabi.

Karimah, I. W., Surahman, C., Sumarna, E., & Nabila, Z. F. (2025). Tarbawi Values in QS. at-Taubah:122 as the Foundation of Islamic Educational Objectives. Jurnal Studi Sosial Keagamaan, 5(2), 198–210.

Kurnia, A., Kustati, M., Sepriyanti, N., Aisyah, S., & Oviensy, V. (2024). Revitalisasi Pendidikan Karakter dalam PAI sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Radikalisme pada Remaja. Mauriduna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v5i2.1172.

Māturīdī, Abū Manṣūr. (2005). Ta’wīlāt Ahl al-Sunnah Tafsīr al-Māturīdī (1st ed., Vol. 5). Daarul Kutub ’Ilmiyyah.

McInerney, P. (2009). Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Engagement for Alienated Youth: Insights from Freire and School‐Based Research. Critical Studies in Education, 50(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480802526637

Mohd Zarif, M. M. (2020). The Significance of the ‘Ten Fundamentals’ (al-Mabādi’ al- ‘Asharah) in Conceptualizing the Epistemic Aims of Learning in Islam. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 45–78. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.sp2020no2.2

Muid, A., Zidane, D. A., & Irsyadah, F. (2024). Ilmu Pengetahuan (Tafsir Surat Al-Mujadalah [58]:11. Al-Zumar [39]:9, serta Al-Taubah [9]:122. Jurnal Maziyatul Ilmi.

Munjahid, M., & Latansa, A. M. (2026). Qur’anic Conceptions of Knowledge and Contemporary Islamic Educational Praxis: Exegesis of QS. Al-Mujadilah 58:11 and QS. Al-Fathir 35:28. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(2), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i2.10170

Mustaqim, A. (2017). Metode penelitian Al-Qur’an dan tafsir. Idea Press. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/32327/

Nafisah, A., Qiso, A. A., Davik, & Muttaqin, M. (2023). Konsep Pendidikan Islam dalam Pandangan Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.32806/jkpi.v4i1.319.

Naisabūrī, Abū Ḥasan Muḥammad b ʽAlī. (1411H). Asbāb Nuzūl al-Qur’an (1st ed., Vol. 1). Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Nihayah, H. (2016). Konsep Pendidikan Islam Dalam Prespektif Al Qur’an Surat at Taubah Ayat 122. Al Ulya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 27–38.

Nurphi, M., Asy’arie, B. F., Ma’ruf, R. A., & Mariyana, W. (2024). Menggali Dampak Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka: Tinjauan antara Keunggulan, Manfaat dan Persepsi Negatif. Mauriduna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v5i2.1199

Pino, D. (2021). Group (Epistemic) Competence. Synthese, 199(3–4), 11377–11396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03294-2

Qushayrī, ‘Abd al-Karīm ibn Hawāzin ibn ‘Abd al-Malik al-. (1431). Laṭāif al-‘Isyārāt (1st ed., Vol. 2). Hai’ah al-Mishriyyah.

Rochmad, R., Sabila, M. H., Muzakky, F., Köylü, B. Ö., & Munawar, A. M. (2026). Metaphor in QS. Az-Zumar: 9 as Cognitive Framework of Knowledge and Revelation. Qist: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 5(2), 711–734. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v5i2.17403

Said, E. W. (1996). Representations of the Intellectual (9th ed.). Vintage Books: New York.

Sales, A., Ferrández-Berrueco, R., Sanahuja, A., & Moliner, O. (2024). Knowledge Mobilisation Strategies for Responsible and Inclusive Academic Research. European Journal of Higher Education, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2113904

Setyana, I. N. A., & Asbari, M. (2023). Standar Intelektual: Solusi untuk Masalah Pendidikan. 02(06).

Setyaningsih, K. (2017). Esensi Transformasi Sistem Sentralisasi-Desentralisasi Pendidikan Dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat. Journal of Islamic Education Management, 3(1).

Sulam, I., Zulhaini, Z., & Akbar, H. (2023). Analisis prinsip-prinsip pendidikan dalam perspektif al-qur’an (Studi Tafsir Surah At-Taubah Ayat 122). JOM FTK UNIKS (Jurnal Online Mahasiswa FTK UNIKS), 3(2), 93–109.

Syahputra, A. E. A., & Ismail, Y. Z. (2025). Klasifikasi Jihad dalam Al-Qur’an: Telaah Penafsiran Hamka terhadap QS. At Taubah ayat 122 dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jurnal Pesona Indonesia, 2(1), 40–48.

Syauqi, M. A., Darmanto, D., Zunarti, R., Saleh, K., Asy’arie, B. F., & Ayuba, O. J. (2025). Formation of Spiritual and Social Attitudes through Learning Akidah Akhlak in the Digital Era. Mauriduna : Journal of Islamic Studies, 6(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v6i2.51.

Ṭabarī, Abū Ja’far Ibn Jarīr. (1431). Jāmiʽ al-Bayān ʽan Ta’wīl ‘Āyi al-Qur’an (1st ed., Vol. 14). Dār al-Tarbiyyah wa al-Turāṡ.

Thoyibah, T., Muhlisin, M., Solehudin, Moch. S., Syukur, F., & Rokhmah, A. (2026). The Emancipatory Critical Paradigm in Islamic Religious Education as an Effort to Form a Tolerant and Multicultural Attitude. Academia Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.13185

Vaneza, A. P., & Sinambela, T. H. (2025). Peran Guru dalam Perspektif QS At-Taubah Ayat 122: Tafaqquh Fid-Din dan Yunziru. ILMUNA: Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 1(1), 26–33.

Varghese, J. K. (2025). “Embodying” the Intellectual: Edward Said, Public Sphere and the University. Public Humanities, 1, e28. https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2024.34

Zreik, R. (2021). The ethics of the intellectual: Rereading Edward Said. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720903479