Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa pada Perkara Kewarisan: Analisis Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif
Main Article Content
Abstract
Disputes over the distribution of inheritances and the determination of heirs in Indonesia often trigger protracted family conflicts due to legal pluralism, differing interpretations of inheritance provisions, and conflicting economic interests among heirs. Resolution through litigation is often time-consuming, costly, and has the potential to worsen family relationships. Previous research has generally addressed the resolution of inheritance disputes from the perspective of litigation or normative studies of inheritance law, whereas research examining the effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in an integrated manner based on Islamic law and positive law remains relatively limited. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness and obstacles to the implementation of ADR in resolving inheritance disputes. This study employs a juridical-normative method with a legislative and conceptual approach through a literature review, while data are analyzed using content analysis. The results of the study indicate that mediation, negotiation, and conciliation are effective mechanisms because they prioritize deliberation, the principle of kinship, time and cost efficiency, and are in line with the principle of islah in Islamic law. However, its implementation still faces obstacles in the form of a lack of good faith among the parties, the dominance of personal interests, intervention by family members or legal representatives, limitations in mediators’ competence, and the fact that the legal force of out-of-court settlements is not yet optimal. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative and integrative analysis of the application of APS from the perspectives of Islamic law and Indonesian positive law. This study makes a scientific contribution by strengthening the conceptual framework for harmonizing the two legal systems in the resolution of inheritance disputes and recommends strengthening regulations to enhance the effectiveness and legal certainty of APS. This study is limited to a literature-based normative review and therefore does not examine implementation through an analysis of court decisions.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Content License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notice:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Adnan, I. (2024). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Perdata di Indonesia. Al-Muqaronah: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum, 3(1). https://ejournal.stisdarussalam.ac.id/index.php/mh
Anshori, A. G. (2007). Peradilan Agama di Indonesia Pasca UU No. 3 Tahun 2006: Sejarah, Kedudukan, dan Kewenangan. UII Press.
Arifin, N. I., & Puspitasari, D. (2025). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Warisan Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris. Jurnal Duta Hukum, 2(1), 99. https://journal.univgresik.ac.id/index.php/dutahukum/article/view/316.
Aritonang, A. A. (2025). Analisis Sengketa Waris dalam Kasus Perdata No. 703/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mdn: Studi Penetapan Ahli Waris dan Penyelesaian Melalui Mediasi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(3), 1730–1737. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.3890
Asvia, E. S. (2023). Konsep Mediasi dalam Q.S. Al-Nisa Ayat 35 (Perspektif Tafsir Al-Misbah). Pappasang, 5(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.46870/JIAT.V5I2.733
Dahlan, S., & Haryanto, I. (2018). Eksistensi ADR Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Waris Pada Masyarakat Suku Samawa. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 6(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.29303/IUS.V6I2.554
Damayanti, A., Halimah, F., Ramadhani, R. K., Nurin N, T. V., Ambarwati, U. K., & Salsabela, Z. (2025). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS). Jurnal Ekshis, 3(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.59548/JE.V3I1.361
Fatorina, F., & Abdurrahman, F. (2024). Implementasi Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris di Desa Beji Kedungbanteng. Economics, Social, and Humanities Journal (Esochum), 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.65669/ESOCHUM.V4I1.375
Gautama, S. (2001). Prospek dan Pelaksanaan Arbitrase di Indonesia: Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Alternatif (ADR). PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hafid, M., & Arkhan, M. A. (2021). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris di Pengadilan Agama. Syakhshiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32332/SYAKHSHIYYAH.V1I1.3436
Hanif, R. N. F. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Non-Litigasi Melalui Proses Mediasi. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-manado/baca-artikel/13448/penyelesaian-sengketa-non-litigasi-melalui-proses-mediasi.html
Harahap, H. T. (2025). Alternatif Lain Pembagian Warisan: Perdamaian, Ahli Waris Pengganti Dan Sistem Kewarisan Kolektif. ALWAQFU: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Dan Wakaf, 3(1). https://jurnal.alwaqfu.or.id/index.php/alwaqfu/article/view/340
Herda, N. R. (2025). Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Oleh Mediator Non-Hakim Dalam Sengketa Kewarisan (Studi Penelitian di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Lhokseumawe). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29103/JIMFH.V8I3.23336
Horah, R. F. Moh., & Hariyanto, E. (2021). Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah Jalur Non-Litigasi Melalui Mediasi. Istidlal: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.35316/ISTIDLAL.V5I1.302
Irfan, I. (2018). Fungsi Hakam dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Rumah Tangga (Syiqaq) dalam Peradilan Agama. EDUTECH: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(1). https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/edutech/article/view/1888
Khoiriyah, I., & Harry, M. (2025). Upaya Mediasi Non-Litigasi dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Pembagian Harta Waris Sama Rata. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(6), 1250–1260. https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/download/16469/4923/.
Maulana, M. R., Ash Shabah, M. A., Suprihatin, S., & Supriyanto, A. (2025). Penerapan Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Cerai Talak di Pengadilan Agama Kota Bekasi (Studi Perkara Nomor 1542/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bks). El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v11i2.17714
Muhana, A. F. (2026). Expert Assessment in Dispute Resolution. Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas, 2(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.56607/DFKAWK59
Munawar, A. (2022). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Dalam Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam. Kosmik Hukum, 22(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v22i3.154.
Mustika, N., Arsyad, Y. M., & Lawang, H. (2025a). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Ketidakberhasilan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan Tanah: Studi Kasus Perkara No. 292/Pdt.G/2024/Pa.Pw Di Pengadilan Agama Pasarwajo. At-Tasyrih: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam, Vol 11(2). https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v11i2.493
Mustika, N., Arsyad, Y. M., & Lawang, H. (2025b). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Ketidakberhasilan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan Tanah: Studi Kasus Perkara No. 292/Pdt.G/2024/PA.PW Di Pengadilan Agama Pasarwajo. At-Tasyrih: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Hukum Islam, 11(2), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.55849/ATTASYRIH.V11I2.493
Nastiar, R. G., & Latifiani, D. (2025). Ketidakefektifan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Sengketa Tanah (Overlapping) Studi Kasus Badan Pertanahan Kota Semarang. Bookchapter Hukum Dan Lingkungan, 1. https://bookchapter.unnes.ac.id/index.php/hk/article/view/572
Novalinda, D. E. M. (2023). Implementasi dan Efektivitas Mediasi Non-Litigasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Adhaper: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 9(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.36913/ADHAPER.V9I02.44
Nugroho, L. D., Putri, M. M. E., & Masyunah, M. (2025). Keunggulan Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Dibandingkan Dengan Litigasi Di Pengadilan. AHKAM, 4(2), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i2.6009
Nur’ain, N. D., Hambari, H., & Imamah, A. I. (2026). Analisis Efektivitas Mediator dalam Menangani Perkara Perceraian di Kabupaten Bogor Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Cibinong Kelas 1A. USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46773/kx1sf074
Putra, R. K., Kalsum, U., Johari, J., Gusmarani, R., & Sony, E. (2024). Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Non Litigasi. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(6), 2204–2210. https://doi.org/10.56338/JKS.V7I6.5548
Putri, C. F., Susilowardani, S., & Armono, Y. W. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Proses Peralihan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Jika Ahli Waris Penjual Menolak Menandatangani Akta Jual Beli. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(1), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.53625/JIRK.V5I1.10328
Putri, J. T., Mawardi, M., HM, M., Mustika, D. A., & Siswanto, Moh. (2026). Mediasi Sebagai Instrumen Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata yang Efektif dan Berkeadilan. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v9i2.6900
Rizal, F. (2022). Peran Mediasi Sebagai Salah Satu Solusi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Minhaj: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 3(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.52431/minhaj.v3i1.750
Rochmani, R., Faozi, S., & Megawati, W. (2020). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan yang Cepat, Sederhana dan Biaya Ringan. 781–786. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/sendi_u/article/view/8064
Safitri, I., Sembiring, J., & Panjaitan, N. A. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Harta Waris (Studi Kasus Hasil Putusan Nomor 462/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Prg). Vol. 7(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.11793
Saputra, M., Sukiati, S., & Harahap, M. Y. (2025). Yurisprudensi Hukum Penetapan Ahli Waris Melalui Putusan Pengadilan Analisis Putusan Nomor 0669/PDT.G/2019/PA.TGM. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 2437–2444. https://doi.org/10.61104/ALZ.V3I3.1683
Sari, Y., Kamelia, K., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2026). Analisis Efektivitas Peran Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR) Sebagai Solusi di Luar Pengadilan. SIBATIK JOURNAL, 5(2), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.54443/SIBATIK.V5I2.4226
Sayuthi, S., & Sumardi, D. (2021). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Dalam Masyarakat Aceh. Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice, 1(2), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.46339/IJSJ.V1I2.10
Sayyaf, R. T. F. (2023). Mediasi Dan Sulh Sebagai Alternatif Terbaik Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Keluarga Islam. Asy-Syari`ah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2).
Syarif, Z. (2024). Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan dalam Ketentuan Persidangan Hybrid Perkara Perdata. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 7(1), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.56301/CSJ.V7I1.1275
Tamba, T., & Mukharom, M. (2023). Efektivitas Peran Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Bidang Bisnis Maupun Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA), 3(2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.36908/JIMPA.V3I2.247
Tamsil, A. M. I. (2024). Peran Kementerian Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2). https://www.pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1888?__cf_chl_f_tk=AMZJXhfxhKnBFU1TFGByJoGcQTsAuy4rfVS5MUl.kyQ-1783409778-1.0.1.1-SH.iF3SFqXPB7i5EqXqpCsGC5g7if1DhkS7.H2pNjEg.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2020). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Hukum Arbitrase. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wulandari, F. (2025). Penyelesaian Konflik Warisan Secara Shuluh oleh Masyarakat di Kantor Desa Pandan Wangi Kecamatan Jerowaru. Al-Ihkam, 17(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.20414/alihkam.v17i2.14631
Yunanto, Y. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Spiritual terhadap Pelanggaran dalam Hukum Keluarga. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/HP.7.1.64-80